To begin with, I agree with most of President Trump’s stated positions on the Second Amendment. I say “most,” because one—which on the surface may look like the light at the end of the tunnel—may actually be an oncoming train.

What I’m talking about is national reciprocity for concealed carry permits, and I’m totally against the idea.

Why am I against national concealed carry? To begin with, who knows what the law might entail and what amendments would be added?

“But,” you say, “a concealed carry permit would be just like a driver’s license!” Actually no, it is not.

Driver’s licenses are an interstate compact, or an agreement between states and not covered by Federal law. The exception is a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL), which does carry Federal restrictions.

In my home state of Arizona, my concealed weapon permit is currently recognized by 37 states. (On a side note, I have little or no desire to travel to the 13 states that do not acknowledge my rights as a citizen.)

Arizona is a “constitutional carry” state. No permit to carry—either concealed or openly—is necessary. Permits are available that allow an individual to carry a concealed weapon, serve as a prima facie proof of a background check so an NICS check is not necessary when purchasing a firearm, and a few other “bennies.”

But what if a national concealed-carry permit would accept the California model of “need to show cause” to obtain a permit? Also in some locales, owning a jewelry store or carrying cash is enough to show “need,” but saying you want a permit for self-defense is not justified. Such laws place loot before life, and there is no guarantee that a new Federal law would not encompass at least some of them.

In my opinion, dot gov is already too large, and I don’t want their fingers anywhere near my firearms or my God-given right to possess/carry them, and adapting a national permit allows federal control where it doesn’t belong.

Trump promised to “drain the swamp.” Let’s hope he doesn’t add any more putrid water to the swamp with unnecessary laws.

Until next time, stay low and watch your back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like
Read More

Arms Through the Ages: Military Arms in the Hands of Citizens

While the history of mankind is characterized by war and conflict, that history is often driven by technology. Starting when that hypothetical early soldier tied a sharp rock to the end of a stick and made himself a spear, man has tried to produce weapons superior in effect and efficiency to those of his enemies. While the current public discourse on “assault weapons” incites frenetic opinions on both ends of the political spectrum, what seems to be lost is simply how tired the argument itself has become. The scariest full-auto polymer “assault rifle” of today will be ancient history a century from now.
Read More

The Cutting Edge: Bud Nealy Shrike

The Shrike is an exciting new covert-carry fixed-blade knife designed for personal protection. It's the result of a collaboration between custom knifemaker Bud Nealy and a veteran Federal agent. Bud needs no introduction. He's a former professional musician who has become one of the world’s top knifemakers.