Since the beginning of 2018, at least 45 law enforcement officers across the U.S. have been killed while on duty. This works out to slightly less than two officers killed per week.

While not on track to match the horrendous numbers of 2017 (129 officers killed) and 2016 (135 officers killed), as this is written, we still have a long, hot summer ahead of us.

What are some possible reasons for the increase in the murder of police officers?

First may be the unprecedented use of ubiquitous phone video cameras. Some believe that as officers’ actions are being recorded, it may make them hesitant to respond in a timely manner. It is a fact that some officers have been initially blamed for an incident but later found not guilty.

More probable is the anti-police hate speech spewed at so many “rallies.” This is exacerbated by politically correct, weak-kneed administrators who order officers to retreat or take no action, further emboldening criminals.

A thought in the back of some officers’ minds is the feeling a department may not stand behind them after an officer-involved shooting.

There are reasons to support such a line of thought. In California, a measure before the state assembly would increase the state standard for lethal use of force from “reasonable” to “necessary” to become law. If passed, this would put officers in the crosshairs of more potential cop killers.

This flies in the face of two U.S. Supreme Court cases 30 years ago that created a legal precedent that police can kill suspects if a “reasonable” officer in similar circumstances would have acted the same way.

The above may be some causes and effects of officer shootings, but most attacks are aimed at one or two officers in fairly remote areas, so what can be done to prevent more officers from being murdered?

The first, obviously, is heightened situational awareness. Note that I did not say heightened vigilance. Situational awareness can be increased while in Condition Yellow, while heightened vigilance requires being in Condition Orange, which most people cannot maintain for a prolonged period of time.

Second, wait for backup. Going it alone has been referred to as “Tombstone Courage”—and we already have too many tombstones.

Until next time, stay low and watch your back—especially our LEO readers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like
Read More

Switch Hitter: Beretta ARX

As someone who carried government issued and personally owned Colt and Ruger 5.56mm NATO caliber carbines during my law enforcement career, I was interested in evaluating a Beretta ARX 5.56 NATO carbine to determine how this rifle performed compared to more popular designs. Here are the results of the ARX field test that began in 2014 and ended in 2015.
Read More

Good Guys Win! Second Amendment in Action

Since he had a weekday off, the Clearwater, Florida man decided to sleep in Thursday morning. His extra slumber was disturbed around 9:30AM by noises that he ignored at first, assuming they were caused by nearby construction. But it didn’t take long for him to realize the noises were actually coming from someone trying to break into his house.
Read More

Let’s Hear it for the .40: The Ideal Caliber

Over many years of research, I have learned a few things concerning wound ballistics. Among these truths is that only actual damage counts for anything. The wound potential of a cartridge depends upon the level of penetration of a bullet and the expansion, if any, of the projectile. Larger bullets make bigger holes. Coupled with the constant of adequate penetration, a larger caliber always has more potential to do damage, cause blood loss, and shut down the adversary’s body.